Footnotes: cannot be included in book reviews or case notes and any references in those submissions should be included in the main text. Quotations of more than c. 60 words (unless in footnotes) should be indented and set off from the text without quotation marks. Type with initial capitals for main words only and in italics (precede by A, B, etc. Our general result is that all three categories play a role within the context of UK legal academia, though the relationship between the “macro” and the “micro” level is not always straight-forward. Abstract and keywords: All manuscripts should be submitted together with an Abstract of 80 to 100 words in length and up to seven key words. For more information about the benefits of choosing to publish Open Access, see here. This stage can take up to a month as it can be difficult to locate suitable reviewers who are willing to act. Authors are required to submit all book reviews to the CLJ in Word format to: A.G. He may be precluded from certain types of employment, or be prevented from driving a vehicle. Bloustein, “Privacy, Tort Law, and the Constitution: Is Warren and Brandeis’ Tort Petty and Unconstitutional As Well?” (1968) 46 Tex. The Cambridge Law Journal Submit your article; Information; Subscribe; Submit your article. The abbreviated citation should only refer to the neutral citation (where it exists), or the Law Report where no neutral citation exists. References to specific pages do not use “at,” “p.” or “pp.”: F.H. 561 col. WA 92 (28 February 1995) (Italics for written answers). The students and professionals generally in the publications, concerning the mentioned subject, choose the Cambridge referencing style. Page layout: Paragraphs start flush left after headings but otherwise are indented, with no extra space between them. 1, Case C-234/02 P, European Ombudsman v Lamberts [2004] E.C.R. If below 10, these should be spelt out. Please note that the use of any of these services is voluntary, and at the author's own expense. The principal collection of UK law journals in LawBod have shelf marks beginning Cw UK 300 and are located on the main floor. ... Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal. Name/Affiliation: All identifying information should be removed from the manuscript to allow for anonymous peer-review. Use the style "10 February 1989"; "1988-89"; "1990s". 10,587 students joined last month! (i.e. The purpose of the Abstract is to identify the subject matter of the article and to summarise the distinctive contribution to the literature which the article makes. For more information on predatory publishing, please visit the Think Check Submit website. Check if you have access via personal or institutional login, International Monetary Fund. It is a vacant concept—oddly enough rather like thin air. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. Cancel. E.g. Their function is not to provide a comprehensive list of what the author has read nor the materials which the reader could use to follow up the argument. Decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union before 2011 may use the ECLI method or may continue to be cited as follows: Number, names of the parties in italics, year in square brackets, report (without the date of the decision), e.g. Do not use cross references , e.g. Quite naturally, many are concerned to try to make responsible investment choices; the ethical investment industry has itself become a multi-million pound business. Owen Bowcott, “Supreme Court Orders Libel Case Retrial Over Judge’s ‘Barrage of Hostility’”, The Guardian, available at https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/jun/03/supreme-court-orders-libel-case-retrial-over-judges-barrage-of-hostility (last accessed 5 June 2020). Use the author's name and year to cite the source in-text. THERE can be little doubt that the spectre of false rape allegations has significantly influenced the development of legal doctrine and its enforcement. A decision will be made whether to reject, to accept or to seek revisions. 255 col. 503w (28 February 1995) (Italic pagination for written answers), HC Deb. L.R.611, R. (Miller) v Prime Minister (Lord Advocate and others intervening); Cherry and others v Advocate-General for Scotland (Lord Advocate and others intervening) [2019] UKSC 41, [2020] A.C.373.